--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shukra69" <stephen4359@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know what Maharishi states is the correct sequence > > > > > for reading the Vedic literature? > > > > > > > > 1. Close mind. > > > > 2. Open book. > > > > > > Heh. So reading Sanskrit out loud without trying to > > > comprehend it requires a closed mind? > > > > B-b-b-but Lawson, that's what Barry *means*. > > Since you aren't going to be *using* your mind, > > you might as well close it; then you won't be > > tempted to try to make sense of the Sanskrit. > > Or anything else. > > Everyone knows that faith in Maharishi is all > you need. :-) > > > > Seems to me that you have to have some semblance of an > > > open mind to bother with such a task, unless you're so > > > fanatical about MMY's teachings that you just assume > > > he's correct in the first place. > > > > However, there's no need for an open mind once > > you've already decided MMY isn't correct about > > *anything*. > > More like there's no need for one once you've > decided that he's right about pretty much *every- > thing*, while denying that's what you're doing.
Both are the case, actually. > As Dr. Phil says, "How's that workin' for you?" :-) So how *is* it working for you?
