--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TurquoiseB wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > >> As for the film I can see why it has not gotten too good > >> of reviews > > > > I just watched a few clips from the film, and remain > > underwhelmed. Shockingly wooden acting in the clips > > I saw, of the sort that only someone with a New-Agey > > "vision" would think that audiences would forgive. > > I think I'll wait for someone to rip the DVD and put > > it up on Liewire... > > I didn't want to comment too much on the film as I would be > getting into spoilers. I question how deep Aronofsky is into > spiritual matters: as deep as folks here or more likely a > weekend dabbler or spectator.
"Frank, who all this time had been reclining with his eyes closed, suddenly opened them both up as wide as a tiger. 'And just how far would you like to go in?' he asked and the three kings all looked at each other. 'Not too far but just far enough so's we can say that we've been there,' said the first chief. 'All right,' said Frank, 'I'll see what I can do,' and he commenced to doing it." -- Bob Dylan, the liner notes to John Wesley Harding > Given it is Warner Brother's film it may be awhile for the DVD. > You might find the trivia section on IMDB very interesting. It > was originally going to star Brad Pitt and Kate Blanchet but > Pitt and Aronofsky had creative differences. The budget was > $75 mil and WB had already sunk $20 mil by the time the first > production fell apart. A second budget was submitted and the > film done for $35 mil. > > I actually found "What the Bleep" to be more interesting. This last line was all you had to say. :-)
