TurquoiseB wrote:
> --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> TurquoiseB wrote:
>>
>>> --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> As for the film I can see why it has not gotten too good
>>>> of reviews
>>>>
>>> I just watched a few clips from the film, and remain
>>> underwhelmed. Shockingly wooden acting in the clips
>>> I saw, of the sort that only someone with a New-Agey
>>> "vision" would think that audiences would forgive.
>>> I think I'll wait for someone to rip the DVD and put
>>> it up on Liewire...
>>>
>> I didn't want to comment too much on the film as I would be
>> getting into spoilers. I question how deep Aronofsky is into
>> spiritual matters: as deep as folks here or more likely a
>> weekend dabbler or spectator.
>>
>
> "Frank, who all this time had been reclining with
> his eyes closed, suddenly opened them both up as
> wide as a tiger. 'And just how far would you like
> to go in?' he asked and the three kings all looked
> at each other. 'Not too far but just far enough
> so's we can say that we've been there,' said the
> first chief. 'All right,' said Frank, 'I'll see
> what I can do,' and he commenced to doing it."
>
> -- Bob Dylan, the liner notes to John Wesley Harding
>
>
>> Given it is Warner Brother's film it may be awhile for the DVD.
>> You might find the trivia section on IMDB very interesting. It
>> was originally going to star Brad Pitt and Kate Blanchet but
>> Pitt and Aronofsky had creative differences. The budget was
>> $75 mil and WB had already sunk $20 mil by the time the first
>> production fell apart. A second budget was submitted and the
>> film done for $35 mil.
>>
>> I actually found "What the Bleep" to be more interesting.
>>
>
> This last line was all you had to say. :-)
Yeah but the blissninnies will probably like it: "look there's Hugh
Jackman doing siddhasana! He must be enlightened!"
