--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 11, 2006, at 3:16 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > >> > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > >>> > >> <snip> > >>> You really *do* see the fact that > >>> we have different ideas than you have -- an expressing > >>> them -- as somehow "abusing" you. > >> > >> I kinda doubt that's what Lawson thinks of as "abuse." > >> I rather suspect he's referring to the abuse you and > >> Vaj regularly dish out to TMers. > > > > You'll never get this, but for the record, saying > > that most TMers know very little about other spiritual > > traditions and not much more about their own is not > > abuse. It's a statement of fact. > > Amen. Furthermore, in general, TMers don't really know the > undiluted truth of their own tradition. > > Perhaps we should call it the "Ostrich Effect"? As I've said > before, they're also probably the most attached to the *idea* > or *mental constructs* on enlightenment than any group I know > or've come across.
Heh. So having oodles of knowledge about other spiritual traditions and the "undiluted truth" of our own tradition would make us less attached to the "idea or mental constructs on enlightenment"? Like, you know, you? <ROAR>
