--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > On the one side of it you're > > > just an Ordinary Joe with an OPINION. On the other side > > > (the one you're on currently), you're a fanatic. > > > > Let's go a step further, and admit that all you have > > said is neither incorrect nor correct, and all that > > Vaj has stated is neither incorrect or correct, and > > that it is ALL opinion. Even the socalled traditions > > hold merely opinions. That to say TM is a false path > > is opinion. That to say it is a valid path is opinion. > > My opinion remains that Tibetan Buddhism is at least > > a failed tradition. > > > > Now THAT I can live with. Can you? > > Sure.
Funny how you couldn't live with it just a couple of posts ago: > I have encountered quite a few > teachers from other traditions that would (and have) > considered TM a false path. So has Vaj. Therefore > what he said is absolutely correct. I can think of > half a dozen traditions that would consider TM a > false path for no other reason than because the TMO > charges money for it. That is their right. > > YOU don't agree with it, so you're characterizing > what he said as "incorrect." It is not. You just > don't like it. <snip> > You took a statement of Vaj's that is clearly literally > correct and claimed that it was "incorrect" because you > don't agree with it. <horselaugh>
