--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is factually my opinion. lol!
It is *merely* your opinion. > My opinion remains that you derive your spiritual growth from a > failed tradition. The jury is still out on TM- maybe it fails, maybe > it doesn't, but no such ambiguity with Tibetan Buddhism- It has > failed. Tibet has been conquered. Case closed. *IMO*. You can believe this if you want. But just for fun, please cite me scripture and verse where it is stated as unequivocable spiritual fact that if the country that a spiritual tradition is prevalent in is conquered and overrun, that spiritual tradition is "false." Hint: You won't even be able to find *Maharishi* saying this. It's something you made up, and have now decided is fact. I mean, dude...what you are doing is taking something that *Maharishi* believes and accepting it as unequivo- cable spiritual fact. Then, based on that "fact," you are drawing a conclusion. Maharishi's belief is OPINION. So is your belief that his belief is accurate. Neither is fact. Solipsism, dude.
