--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "llundrub" <llundrub@> wrote: > > > > > > > > You just seem angry to me. > > > > > > > > -----Rather petulant and childish to me.,___ > > > > > > Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. > > > He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. > > > > > The other remark I have about my challenges to you and Vaj yesterday > > was that here you sit day after day after day, challenging much of > > what TM is and who Maharishi is, and all who respond do so in the > > context of evaluating TM and Maharishi. > > > > So yesterday, understanding that I apply merciless rigor to TM and > > Maharishi and the TMO with regard to my acceptance or not of them, I > > decided "why should Turq and Vaj be getting a free ride out of all > > of this?" Why not apply the same rigor and scrutiny to their > > practices as I do to my own? > > > > And the results were very eye opening, you True Believers > > you!...Lol! :-) > > Please produce anything in either my posts of Vaj's > that sounded "True Believer" like to you.
The thing I find humorous about all of this is you first agreed with me yesterday that all was opinion; your stuff, my stuff, Vaj's stuff, traditions' stuff, Everyone's stuff, and then you keep asking me for evidence. Of what? My opinions? Lol!!! So what if I present them as facts? You've got an easy out- Don't Believe Me! Start learning to live with some of that ambiguity and paradox you talk about.
