--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "llundrub" <llundrub@> 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You just seem angry to me.
> > > > > 
> > > > > -----Rather petulant and childish to me.,___
> > > > 
> > > > Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry.
> > > > He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday.
> > > >
> > > The other remark I have about my challenges to you and Vaj 
> yesterday 
> > > was that here you sit day after day after day, challenging much 
> of 
> > > what TM is and who Maharishi is, and all who respond do so in 
> the 
> > > context of evaluating TM and Maharishi. 
> > > 
> > > So yesterday, understanding that I apply merciless rigor to TM 
> and 
> > > Maharishi and the TMO with regard to my acceptance or not of 
> them, I 
> > > decided "why should Turq and Vaj be getting a free ride out of 
> all 
> > > of this?" Why not apply the same rigor and scrutiny to their 
> > > practices as I do to my own?
> > > 
> > > And the results were very eye opening, you True Believers 
> > > you!...Lol! :-)
> > 
> > Please produce anything in either my posts of Vaj's
> > that sounded "True Believer" like to you. My entire
> > exchange with you yesterday was to help you realize
> > how much of a solipsist you are -- you just make
> > pronouncements, as if the fact that you have come
> > to believe something makes it an actual fact. 
> 
> You have your opinions and I have mine. I thought we had cleared 
> that up yesterday. I will continue to think of both you and Vaj as 
> True Believers, which I define as those willing to be less critical 
> of their own beliefs than they are those of others. Tibetan Buddhism 
> ain't all its cracked up to be. *IMO*.
>

If you think Vaj is a "TB", I guess you never really talked to him or heard his 
talk on 
Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature...


Reply via email to