--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "dhamiltony2k5"
> > <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And if the Dalai Lama had been as quick
> > > > to abandon his principles as Maharishi has been over the
> > > > years, I'm sure that he (the Dalai Lama) would not be the
> > > > laughingstock he is considered worldwide, whereas Maharishi
> > > > is universally revered and respected.
> > >
> > > Good satire Turq. Good thot full comparison.
> > >
> > > I have been out traveling from FF to spiritual places out West
and
> > > recently out East, and it is informative to hear people in
reaction
> > > to Maharishi when you go other places.
> > >
> > > Very aware of his money grubbing TMorg aquisitive ways of the
last
> > > couple of decades. But that MMY dropped off the radar screen
> > > generally and had become inconsequential. Past tense.
> >
> > I used to live in Santa Fe, New Mexico, a hotbed for
> > *anything* spiritual or Newagey. So naturally there
> > was a market for spiritual satire as well. Thus there
> > was a short article that appeared in one of the papers
> > there a few years ago that listed "The Most Embarrassing
> > Spiritual Teachers To Have To Admit You Studied With."
> > It was pretty hilarious. Suffice it to say that the
> > author felt it was considerably hipper to have studied
> > with Rajneesh or Maharaj-Ji than Maharishi. MMY was in
> > the same grouping as Pat Robertson.
>
> And, last election, more than half the country voted for GW Bush...
>
So we can conclude the author mentioned above is a Republican. ;-)
