--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 15, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Vaj wrote: > > > On Dec 15, 2006, at 4:05 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > >> Suffice it to say that the > >> author felt it was considerably hipper to have studied > >> with Rajneesh or Maharaj-Ji than Maharishi. MMY was in > >> the same grouping as Pat Robertson. > > > > > > If you look behind the veneer and the staging and the silk getup, > > it's rather similar: a Hindu fundie and a X-tian fundie, each using > > marketing and media to amass great wealth and each promising > > salvation (each also with a political agenda), one instantly > > (accept jesus, etc., etc.) and the other in 5-7 years. > > > Ooops. Forgot proselytizing. M. is unique in that he uses > "scientific" proselytizing and the circus tent revival thing has > been replaced with a dome. "Peace on earth, good will to men" is > replaced with "coherence" or "super-radiance" which will > (according to their scientific "tracts") eventually lead to world > peace. Pat uses the Bible, esp. the NT (featuring Jesus), Mahesh > uses the Bhagavad-gita in a commercial translation filled with > references to the product and Krishna.
Even more pathological.
