--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 15, 2006, at 11:53 AM, sparaig wrote: > > > Well, y'know, when all is said and done, MMY can at least claim > > that you can ATTEMPT to > > verify some of his claims objectively. > > > > YOU, on the other hand, have backed off and now say "who cares?" > > > > That's the standard response from religious people when their > > beliefs about reality are > > threatened by scientific investigation. > > > > Nothing wrong with being a religious person, but why should someone > > pay more attention > > towhat YOU have to say than to what some fundamentalist Christian > > has to say, regarding > > religious and spiritual beliefs and practices? > > > Actually the closer you look, the more similar they are. Research is > being done on prayer. Instead of "coherence" and > "superradiance" (laser physics terms IIRC) Pat uses "laser-beam > prayer" and "Prayer offensives". It all goes to show: know your > market. For example the words "prayer offensive" may appeal more to > gun owners and military types. Coherence (my personal fav) has more > of a geek appeal. >
Yeah, Larry Domash and Brian Josephson consulted with marketing types about which PHysics term to use to target which non-existent margetting segment when they first came up with the idea and presented it to MMY.
