--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 2006, at 12:13 AM, sparaig wrote: > > > > > > > How did you ever find it? > > > > > > Just looked for a nearby forest and then when I saw the > > > buildings in a N-S/E-W grid, I found it. It stuck out > > > because it went against the natural pattern of roads > > > and other buildings. > > > > That's what I've never understood about S-V, the > > desire to try to impose an obviously artificial > > structure on the beautiful and delightful forms > > of nature. > > > > The other geomancy-oriented studies on the planet -- > > Feng Shui, Sa-che (Tibetan geomancy), and even > > Western geomancy -- are all about trying to suss > > out the natural organization and energy flow of > > nature, and then taking advantage of it and living > > in harmony with it. But S-V (at least as interpreted > > by Maharishi) seems to be a remarkly control-freak > > approach -- trying to make nature "submit" to puny > > humans' idea of what it should be. > > Every resource online says exactly the same thing. In > fact, if you look at the design of the oldest cities > in India, you'll find they are laid out exactly that > way. The ruins were uncovered some years ago.
So you're trying to make the point that ancient Indians were just as much control freaks and just as out of touch with nature as Maharishi is? :-)
