--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: <snip> > > > > But S-V (at least as interpreted > > > > by Maharishi) seems to be a remarkly control-freak > > > > approach -- trying to make nature "submit" to puny > > > > humans' idea of what it should be. > > > > > > Every resource online says exactly the same thing. In > > > fact, if you look at the design of the oldest cities > > > in India, you'll find they are laid out exactly that > > > way. The ruins were uncovered some years ago. > > > > So you're trying to make the point that ancient > > Indians were just as much control freaks and just > > as out of touch with nature as Maharishi is? :-) > > > I guess...
Hmmm, I thought the point you were trying to make was that Barry was incorrect to suggest that MMY's interpretation of S-V might be faulty. Funny how that correction slipped right by Barry...
