--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "hugheshugo"
<richardhughes103@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Peter <drpetersutphen@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Are you serious with the last part here, that the TMO
> > > can enter his home/apartment?
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > Yes, deadly serious. we had a good laugh about it (I did anyway).
> >
> > The interesting thing is, I have told a few other people I know
who
> > are interested in buying here and they agree that the company
that
> > built the site (not the TMO but obviously all movement chaps and
> > dedicated in everyway) should have the right to keep it "pure".
And I
> > imagine people who live there will be upset at any deviations
from
> > the norm, bad for "coherence" you see.
>
> If you buy a home in order to be in a "pure" community, you want
everyone else to be in-
> step with you as well.
>
About 15 years ago I lived in a large planned community in Maryland
on the East Coast. The population was large enough to have a zip
code or two, and every development in the community had rules, like
what color your house could be, what your fences had to look like,
etc. And it was all strictly enforced. It worked too, and the whole
place looked harmonious. We could, though, have whatever color
wallpaper we wanted...
