--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 27, 2006, at 12:58 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > > > MMY doesn't claim CC leads to heaven, so this point doesn't make > > > sense (not saying your > > > conclusion is wrong, but only that you haven't brought any "reason" > > > to your argument (as > > > usual...)). > > > > > > Correct. One of many items lost in the watering-down process, no doubt. > > > > Also note, I am not repsonsible for the common lack of relative and > > experiential knowledge in many TMer's and their own alleged > > tradition. Why should I waste my time educating you for your own > > failings? You have a fine brain, use it. Just because you don't > > recognize some inference in my writing(s) is no surprise to me, > > merely a comment your own lack of depth and experience. > > > > Heh. YOU were the one that quoted someone about the pitfalls of promising heaven (after > death). MMY generally talks about Heaven on Earth, not after death. His relatively few > discussions of death and CC don't intersect with what you quoted in any way at all. It's not > a matter of lack of depth to point this out.
But you see, Lawson, TM supporters must *always* be put down and portrayed as ignorant, etc., whenever they say anything and whatever they say. If there's nothing in context to put them down about, a non sequitur phrased to sound as though it's somehow related to what they said is entirely acceptable.
