Thanks for the background info on Bollywood. I have very
little feel for things Indian, and so don't follow the
modern films much at all, so it's a new experience for me.

<snip to>
--- In [email protected], t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Always in India, being fair-skinned is looked upon superior, 
> so models or actors with fair skin have better chances. Thats 
> maybe a caste thing, lower castes are often associated with 
> darker skin. I have been surprised how Indians call themselves 
> 'white' and 'black' where we just see different shades of brown. 

I saw the same thing in Morocco, growing up there in 
the early 60s. Even though most Moroccans were darker-
skinned than Europeans, it was clear that their status
in Moroccan society was largely determined by *how*
dark their skin was. The lighter their skin, the higher
the status they were perceived to have, and the "better"
they were perceived to be. There was an inherent distrust
of anyone with dark skin. Even back then there was a huge 
market in cosmetic bleaching agents and "skin lighteners." 

Therefore, rather than associate this preference for light 
skin to dark with India and its ideas of caste, I suspect 
that it may just be a (sadly) universal trend in human 
beings, period.

Changing whole sets of facial *features* via cosmetic
surgery to make them appear more Western, however, is
another thing entirely. That's a more disturbing trend
IMO.

Obviously, I've been tripping on this idea of cosmetic
surgery lately. I find the whole phenomenon fascinating,
and strangely related to two different approaches to
the spiritual quest. So I'll follow up this post with
one I made to another forum, which generated some 
interesting comments there. Maybe it'll do so here
as well. Then again, maybe monkeys will fly out of
my surgically-lifted butt.  :-)



Reply via email to