--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 4, 2007, at 9:47 AM, sparaig wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Jan 3, 2007, at 3:09 PM, sparaig wrote: > >> > >>>> Unless of course an increase in overall numbers also increases > >>>> side- > >>>> effects and the incidence meditative disorders. All the more reason > >>>> to include any negative side-effects in your research! To > >>>> exclude it > >>>> in your research is irresponsible and dangerous to sentient beings. > >>>> To exclude and use it to promote and/or sell your "brand" of > >>>> meditation is criminal. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Ah, so you're saying that group meditation has harmful side- > >>> effects? Do you mean on a > >>> personal or societal level, or both? > >> > >> > >> I was referring to pre-existing meditational disorders on an > >> individual basis, but of course it could cause latent issues to arise > >> as well (perhaps collectively?). > >> > >> If you accept that we are all radiating our state of consciousness > >> continually, of course that dis-ease would radiate as well, no? > >> > > > > Heh. You have not a clue what the ME is supposed to be about, do > > you... > > > I just don't believe everything I'm sold or told. >
Yeah, but the rationale for the ME precludes the radiating of disharmonious states. It's like assuming that since heat radiates, cold must radiate also. Isn't so.
