--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:16 AM, sparaig wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: <snip> > >>>> If you accept that we are all radiating our state of > >>>> consciousness continually, of course that dis-ease would > >>>> radiate as well, no? > >>> > >>> Heh. You have not a clue what the ME is supposed to be > >>> about, do you... > >> > >> I just don't believe everything I'm sold or told. > > > > Yeah, but the rationale for the ME precludes the radiating of > > disharmonious states. > > I don't accept that: we radiate our own states constantly, > negative, positive or neutral, it doesn't matter.
However, your question to Lawson at the top here suggests that you assumed he would logically concur that "dis-ease" would radiate as well as coherence. If you actually knew the rationale for the ME, that would have been an absurd question to ask, a straw man. So it appears that your "I just don't believe everything I'm told/sold" was a little disingenuous, no? It wasn't that you disbelieved it, it's that you didn't know what it *was*.
