--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 1/4/07 9:34:33 A.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > the additional rights that > actually *pertain* to the conduct of war never have > to be invoked at all: we can institute as many of > them as we want without worrying about their being > too restrictive, because they'll just be suspended > once we're in a situation to which they're designed > to apply. > > Good thinking, MDixon. > > Rights? Constitutional rights have never been given an enemy > in any war before.
Non sequitur. Please respond in context, or don't bother.
