In a message dated 1/4/07 9:22:34 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The  signatories are expected to 
treat EVRYONE as though they wre signatories  unless the other side violates 
them.



Ah, so Al Qaeda doesn't violate the Geneva Convention, thus are protected  by 
it. Numerous civilian targets with the intent to kill civilians, and the  
kidnapping of civilians, Richard Pearl, Nicholas Berg et al beheaded. This is  
adherence to the Geneva convention?Using civilians as human shields, no 
uniforms 
 to distinguish them from civilians. Forced religious conversions at the  
barrel of a gun. So you think they deserve the best treatment society can  
guarantee  so we don't offend them? Rules for war are only relevant if both  
sides 
observe them. The purpose of war is to destroy your enemy's capacity to  make 
war and force him to submission. If one side chooses not to observe  the rules 
agreed to then the other side should not be bound to the rules. Al  Qaeda has 
chosen  not to observe any rules but to take advantage of any  rules we choose 
to observe.

Reply via email to