Marek Reavis wrote:
> Perhaps that was Shantanand's story, too; and if so, would help
> explain some of the older disciples', like Karpatri Swami and
> others, discomfort with the favoritism shown Shantanand (and 
> some of the other new chelas) and his quick ascent in what was 
> had become the Shankaracharya's Organization (the "SO").  
> 
It's probably much simpler than that - according to what I've heard
the real issue was upholding the teaching and keeping the Adwaita
tradition pure. Apparently Swami Brahmanand Saraswati wasn't very
supportive of the Vaishnava-leaning pundits down in Kashi. That's a
good thing too, because it would be a tragic mistake to elect a
dualistic psychopomp to the Shankaracharya Gaddi up in Joshi. A Swami
that lives near here, supposedly a direct desciple of Guru Dev, claims
to have been offered the Jyotirmath seat at one time - he's a
quasi-dualist fer sure (bheda-bheda). 

>From the Hindustan Times:

Meanwhile, Swami Shantanand had gone and taken over the property
donated by the people of Joshimath to the Shankaracharya. Swami
Swaroopanand, on being consecrated, proceeded to Joshimath and with
his lathi-wielding followers tried to take over the property, which
included a large building called Math and a fruit garden around it.
Fights broke out with guns and lathis, in which Swami Shantanand and
his men won and he remained in control. Swami Swaroopanand bought some
land a little below the original seat area and built a larger Math of
his own on it.

In early 1980s Swami Swaroopanand became the Shankaracharya of the
Dwarakapeeth also. Soon afterwards, the Parishad and others asked him
to choose to remain the Shankaracharya of only one of the peeths and
give up the other. He did not do so, and in 1993, the Council of
Learned Men in Varanasi made Swami Madhavashram the Shankaracharya of
Jyotipeeth.

Read more:

Subject: The Fighting Ascetics of India
Thread: An attack by some naked Naga sadhus in Haridwar
Forum: alt.meditation.transcendental
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 04/07/2002
http://tinyurl.com/yazjv5

Reply via email to