--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 8, 2007, at 3:00 PM, jyouells2000 wrote: > > > The problem is, Jim, that unless someone(s) here has a personal > > relationship > > with Maharishi we (they) don't know what he knows. Just taking what > > has > > come out here about Maharishi it's obvious that we only know what he > > presents > > publically. Teachers, governors, re or decertified, have little > > relationship with Maharishi. What we do have a peculiar kind of PR. > > There is so much hidden in the TMO, that unless we know from our own > > experience, we're just guessing... > > Or unless of course you knew and talked with one of M's closest > confidants who helped set up SCI and the birth of the sidhi > program... :-) > > Having done that you'd know that he knew none of this stuff, but had > to seek it out with couriers dispatched to various locales. You'd > also know that much lecture material was also not his own. And I > believe we have one a brother student of SBS who said flat out, M > knew nothing about yoga: he was not a yogi! >
We also have one brother student who said that MMY was his first choice to succeed him except for the caste issue (Swami Shantananda) and one brother student who says that MMY contributed greatly to SBS's tradition (Swami Vishnudevananda) and one All-India saint (Matanda Moi Ma) whose official biolgraphy mentions visits from MMY and Swami Brahmanada and Swami Shatanada by name, but only mentions the other shankaracharyas by math. > I know this is hard for some people, but it is the plain truth of the > matter. > As you see it...
