--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2007, at 3:00 PM, jyouells2000 wrote: > > > > > The problem is, Jim, that unless someone(s) here has a personal > > > relationship > > > with Maharishi we (they) don't know what he knows. Just taking what > > > has > > > come out here about Maharishi it's obvious that we only know what he > > > presents > > > publically. Teachers, governors, re or decertified, have little > > > relationship with Maharishi. What we do have a peculiar kind of PR. > > > There is so much hidden in the TMO, that unless we know from our own > > > experience, we're just guessing... > > > > Or unless of course you knew and talked with one of M's closest > > confidants who helped set up SCI and the birth of the sidhi > > program... :-) > > > > Having done that you'd know that he knew none of this stuff, but had > > to seek it out with couriers dispatched to various locales. You'd > > also know that much lecture material was also not his own. And I > > believe we have one a brother student of SBS who said flat out, M > > knew nothing about yoga: he was not a yogi! > > > > I know this is hard for some people, but it is the plain truth of the > > matter. > > Nothing would surprise me anymore.... >
So how did this stuff get discovered in the first place Xenu left it our brains when we were exiled to Earth? Or maybe ancient sages invented it on their own? Why can't a gifted amateur reinvent the core teachings after hearing the descriptions of spiritual techniques? And why couldn't said amateur end up getting it more "right" than the people who merely learned it by rote?
