--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "vajradhatu108" > > <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >However, it seems to me that a saint carries his/her own vastu, > > and lives in > > > > a realm far beyond those considerations. > > > > > > Never were truer words spoken!, but I have to add that it's the > > same for EVERYONE, you, me > > > and all. > > > > > > Amen. > > > > > Agreed- it is the seekers in the Movement who blew this SV thing all > > out of proportion, and Maharishi lets everyone interpret it as they > > want to. And whether we are saints or not, there is some benefit to > > physical orientation- it shows up in every tradition. But it isn't > > the 'do it or else' benefit it is made out to be. > > > > MMY wants all movement buildings to be SV. Beyond that, he's given the TMO a never- > ending task to remake the world in an SV image. Doesn't sound like "do or else" scenario.
As already reported here, MMY did tell fairfielders to flee their non-SV homes as if they were on fire and a strong superstitious belief in the dominant power of building orientation on all aspects of one's life persists in many TBs in fairfield. Look at the outrageous prices that poorly built SV homes go for here. Doesn't matter what it sounds like to you, if you actually were to live in fairfield or have some contact with the tmo you would know "do or else" is very much a fundamental tenet of belief in the movt.
