--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "vajradhatu108" > > > <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >However, it seems to me that a saint carries his/her own > vastu, > > > and lives in > > > > > a realm far beyond those considerations. > > > > > > > > Never were truer words spoken!, but I have to add that it's > the > > > same for EVERYONE, you, me > > > > and all. > > > > > > > > Amen. > > > > > > > Agreed- it is the seekers in the Movement who blew this SV thing > all > > > out of proportion, and Maharishi lets everyone interpret it as > they > > > want to. And whether we are saints or not, there is some benefit > to > > > physical orientation- it shows up in every tradition. But it > isn't > > > the 'do it or else' benefit it is made out to be. > > > > > > > MMY wants all movement buildings to be SV. Beyond that, he's given > the TMO a never- > > ending task to remake the world in an SV image. Doesn't sound > like "do or else" scenario. > > > It sometimes gets represented that way though by the Movement. >
I just recall the hot water bottles thing.
