--- In [email protected], "nablusos108"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], off_world_beings <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], wmurphy77 <no_reply@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Science of Being Art of Living page 137 hb.
> > >
> > > "When a man is liberated and his individuality has merged into
> cosmic
> > > existence, then the influence of his past karma will be
received
> by
> > > his son or grandson *or* by those who have blood affinity with
> him."
> > >
> > > You gotta be kiddin' right!!! And this is JUSTICE, I just
> seriously
> > > doubt it!>>
> >
> > Also (see other post), (although I think the whole concept is
bound
> up
> > in linear earthbound thought patterns) what is it that you think
is
> > not justice?
> >
> > When Maharishi says the man is "liberated and his individuality
has
> > merged into cosmic existence", surely he means that the soul is
not
> > bound to even come back to the world, so what is wrong with the
> > concept that his good karma would go back to his bloodline. The
> > bloodline must have some significance in cosmic reality, not
just
> > humpity bumpity, squirty squirty (as in MDIXON's case). Surely
you
> > would hope your children and grandchildren would benefit from
your
> > spiritual growth.
> >
> > However, I really think the whole concept is metaphorical
created
> by
> > humans to satisy the cosmic story in their minds. Life is just a
> play
> > being re-played for fun, so it needs a context that can portray
the
> > plot for any given culture, (on Earth, or on another planet?).
> >
> > In other words, in the context of the quote you gave, what
happens
> to
> > the liberated man whose most powerful concept is: "The World is
My
> > Family" ?
> >
> > OffWorld
>
> In the last book by Swoboda on the life of the Agohra saint
> Vimalananda (highly recommended) he said that genetics is of
utmost
> importance regarding enlightenment. The purity of the bloodline
being
> very important indeed for seeking and upholding transcendence.
This
> may well be somewhat controversial, but then again Vimalanda was
not
> your average Guru telling people what they wanted to hear. He was
a
> very unpredictable and sometimes provoking teacher, I'd love to
have
> met him. Maharishi is also not exactly predictable, to say the
least.
> It's a pitty to hear all those people who dream about the good old
> days of the Movement not realizing that the "Movement belongs to
> those who move." I've never seen anyone moving as fast as
Maharishi.
> I know from firsthand experience that Maharishi supports
Vimalanandas
> view on genetics.>>
I agree with that, because I believe everything in the macroscopic
world mirrors precisely a 'microscopic' blueprint. Therefore,
genetics is a mirror of some important laws of nature.
It is inevitable that: Man and Woman ("Adam and Eve"), baby, son and
daughter, grandmother, family, society, and whole human race, mirror
the mechanics of existence at some fundamental level. I don't see
that it can ever be any other way, even in an 'age of ignorance'.
And I thik it is fundamentally the same on all evolved planets
(though could be superficially very different). But I think the good
karma of an enlightened man is beneficial to the relatives, but that
the bad karma of relatives is not really strong enough to hold back
the evolving sidha (not for long anyway).
OffWorld
