--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of sparaig > Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond > to Vaj.Ignore all is missives > > > > > Of course not. That's why there's no proving this issue one way or the > > other. Nothing to make a court case out of. You examine the evidence, talk > > to sources directly if you're able, and reach your own conclusions. I > heard > > and dismissed these allegations for decades before changing my opinion, so > I > > understand why you're clinging to yours. > > > > I'm not clinging as far as I can tell. TM works for me. The sidhis seem to > be beneficial, at > least in the long-run. What does NOT work for me is to claim that there is > ample evidence > that someone was celibate for 40+ years than suddenly became a sex machine > for 10 > years than became celibate again for the rest of his life. > > > > The evidence may be "ample" but it is clearly not adequate for some. Some > folks here would need to see a video of the alleged affairs to believe they > happened. Even that might be doubted. It depends on how invested one is in > one's worldview. >
Have all the guys during the sexy sadie period stepped foward and said that they agree with it?
