--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of sparaig > Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:13 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond > to Vaj.Ignore all is missives > > > By the same token, does someone saying that they DID have sex with someone > make it > true? How many girls bragged of sex with Elvis? The Beattles? DId ALL of > them have sex > with the person they were bragging about? > > Of course not. That's why there's no proving this issue one way or the > other. Nothing to make a court case out of. You examine the evidence, talk > to sources directly if you're able, and reach your own conclusions. I heard > and dismissed these allegations for decades before changing my opinion, so I > understand why you're clinging to yours. >
I'm not clinging as far as I can tell. TM works for me. The sidhis seem to be beneficial, at least in the long-run. What does NOT work for me is to claim that there is ample evidence that someone was celibate for 40+ years than suddenly became a sex machine for 10 years than became celibate again for the rest of his life.
