> > > Agreed. Each of the criticisms of Maharishi and each of the > praises > > > of him, or responses to the criticisms should be judged on their > own > > > merits. I agree that Barry looks pretty one-sided sometimes, as > if > > > he has already made up his mind regarding any responses to a > > > criticism of Maharishi and what that represents to him. > > > > > > I personally responded to Paul's stuff twice. Once to say his > phony > > > question and answer format was what is commonly known as > a 'hatchet > > > job', in other words selectively picking Q & A, designed to > reveal > > > the subject in the worst possible light, and the second time as a > > > response to the final question and answer posed by Paul, > suggesting > > > that he should perhaps change his name to "Perry Mason", a TV > lawyer > > > who always got his man. Neither response could be characterized > as > > > un-sane or extreme. > >
> I have no strong opinion on Heaven or Hell. Perhaps those states of Bliss and Tamas excist, perhaps not. But if Hell excists I think this Paul Mason fellow is a strong candidate for a prolonged stay in one of those premises. I mean, spreading slander about an outstanding Saint for money ?? It's like a plea for a stay in an unpleasant place. IMO. To be subdued and treated by Tamas for a long period of time at least is a guarantee for not having to deal with this lowlife fellow in our next incarnation.
