--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- nablusos108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Agreed. Each of the criticisms of Maharishi > > and each of the > > > praises > > > > > of him, or responses to the criticisms should > > be judged on > > their > > > own > > > > > merits. I agree that Barry looks pretty > > one-sided sometimes, as > > > if > > > > > he has already made up his mind regarding any > > responses to a > > > > > criticism of Maharishi and what that > > represents to him. > > > > > > > > > > I personally responded to Paul's stuff twice. > > Once to say his > > > phony > > > > > question and answer format was what is > > commonly known as > > > a 'hatchet > > > > > job', in other words selectively picking Q & > > A, designed to > > > reveal > > > > > the subject in the worst possible light, and > > the second time as > > a > > > > > response to the final question and answer > > posed by Paul, > > > suggesting > > > > > that he should perhaps change his name to > > "Perry Mason", a TV > > > lawyer > > > > > who always got his man. Neither response could > > be characterized > > > as > > > > > un-sane or extreme. > > > > > > > > > > > I have no strong opinion on Heaven or Hell. Perhaps > > those states of > > Bliss and Tamas excist, perhaps not. But if Hell > > excists I think this > > Paul Mason fellow is a strong candidate for a > > prolonged stay in one > > of those premises. I mean, spreading slander about > > an outstanding > > Saint for money ?? It's like a plea for a stay in > > an unpleasant > > place. IMO. To be subdued and treated by Tamas for a > > long period of > > time at least is a guarantee for not having to deal > > with this lowlife > > fellow in our next incarnation. > > Stop being so silly. Paul should go to hell because > you don't like what he writes. Ridiculous!
That's a charitable way to put. Frank was hinting at more immediate, more personal responses, of course.
