--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But wait! There's more:
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3074561005024763960&hl=en
> :)
Very unconvincing. The first clip is a fake, staged
by the filmmakers after the fact, with the Fox News
logo and so on stripped in. There's nothing in the
picture when the "witness" is on screen that pegs the
clip to shortly after the buildings' collapse.
The filmmakers then use the obvious phoniness of the
guy's spiel ("Who talks like that?") to assert that
he was a plant--which is correct, but he was *their*
plant.
Very clever, but no cigar.
Having set that up as sinister, they follow with two
perfectly plausible clips of experts bloviating, which,
of course, is what experts do. The filmmakers' comments
attempt to portray the experts as sinister, but they
don't have much to work with.
And the filmmakers assure us these experts were on the
air less than an hour after the attacks, but given their
fakery with the first clip, I have no reason to trust
their version of the timing on the next two; they could
easily have faked the time bug on the MSNBC clip, and the
ABC clip doesn't have one.)
Furthermore, if all these guys were government plants,
how come they could only find three (actually only
two) of them? Why weren't there plants on CNN, NBC,
CBS as well?
Gonna have to do better than that. You're awfully
gullible, Barry.
