--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > Devastating indictment of the 9/11 government- > > > conspiracy film "Loose Change" from, of all > > > places, AlterNet: > > > > > > http://www.alternet.org/story/47986/ > > > > > > > Any meditating structural engineers out there who can offer a view > on > > the probability of the twin towers collapsing in the freefall > > hollywodesquelly neat way they did simply by crashing two airplanes > > into them? > > If they don't have to be meditators, you might > want to read these three reports in the radical > leftwing magazine Counterpunch by Manuel Garcia, > a physicist at Lawrence Livermore with a PhD in > Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering: > > http://www.counterpunch.org/physic11282006.html > http://www.counterpunch.org/thermo11282006.html > http://www.counterpunch.org/darkfire11282006.html >
I am no structural engineer but my gut-feeling when reading this was that it sounded like a debunking job: bits of selective techie speculation based on inaccurate assumptions, embedded in a generally descriptive muzak of a touchi-feelie nature of the event. Finding sources that supports your pov (whatever it is) is not a problem on the Internet :-) http://www.911review.com/reviews/counterpunch/markup/physic11282006.html
