--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], off_world_beings <no_reply@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" 
<jflanegi@> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" 
<jstein@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > > Nevertheless, supernovae are not seen from earth
> > > > > > to flare up and die out in a matter of seconds.
> > > > > >
> > > > > You could be right, based on the recorded evidence, but I 
don't 
> > > > > think that rules out the probability that this could have 
been 
> > > an 
> > > > > actual astronomical event witnessed from earth, yet not 
> > recorded 
> > > > > before? Possibly as some have suggested, something that 
looked 
> > > like 
> > > > > a super nova, but wasn't. Who knows? I just figure the odds 
are 
> > > in 
> > > > > the favor, given the vast size of the observable Universe, 
of a 
> > > > > newly discovered, or unrecorded event, not yet incorporated 
> > into 
> > > > our 
> > > > > current body of knowledge regarding observable astronomical 
> > > > > phenomenon. (whew- that's a mouthful).
> > > > 
> > > > I said earlier that it could have been some even
> > > > more exotic event.  But it couldn't have been a
> > > > supernova.
> > > >
> > > I can't say that with absolute certainty, but going by the 
> > > scientifically accepted speed limit on the visible universe 
being 
> > > that of light, and extrapolating the expansion of mass from a 
star 
> > > using that speed limit, then yes, a convincing case can be made 
for 
> > > the phenomenon described to not be a supernova.>>
> > 
> > Except that some recent theories suggests that the "speed" of 
light, 
> > was never constant, and in the past travelled much faster than we 
> > observe it today. 
> > 
> 
> By the time stars formed, I'm pretty sure that the constant was 
close to today's value.>

Then you know more than the astronomers do.

OffWorld


Reply via email to