--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > . . . 
> > > Actually, it just might be quite entertaining to see the guy talk
> > > himself out of that corner :-)
> > 
> > I imagine there are various word games he can
> > play, but they'll look awfully cute beside his
> > accusations that *Lawson* was playing word games.
> > 
> > > More important, however, is the fact that being and acting in
> > > the capacity of journalist, Andrew Skolnick is de facto bound
> > > by a set of minimum ethical requirements it is not in his
> > > interest that people think he has violated.
> > 
> > If the trial record containing the incriminating
> > language can be tightly documented, perhaps it
> > and his relevant posts could be reproduced--
> > without comment--on various journalism forums.
> > 
> > I wonder if the National Association of Science
> > Writers has an appropriate public forum...
> > 
> > 
> > >      http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?id=387
> > >      http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp
> > > 
> > > I suppose the guy also can be sued 
> 
> 
> It's...what...eight years later now?
> 
> And Andrew Skolnick, the non-meditator, has moved
> on and wisely doesn't even THINK about TM and TMers
> any more, especially about those few insane TMers
> who once obsessed on him and did everything they 
> could to try to destroy him and his reputation 
> because he wrote a few things they didn't like 
> about Deepak Chopra in a medical journal. 

Cf. observation below.

> And the same amount of time later, those *same* pro-
> ponents of meditation, the thing that is supposed
> to free them from attachment and make their lives
> bliss, are *still* obsessing on Skolnick and rubbing
> their cyberhands together with glee as they plot
> how to destroy him and his reputation. The only
> thing that has changed for them in all these years
> is now they try equally hard to destroy Chopra and 
> *his* reputation as well.

You have evidently 'missed' A Skolnick's crusade against anything TMO
at wikipedia. 

> Sure speaks volumes about the value of TM, eh?

Just volumes about you, you m¤%&/%&"#g satanist




Reply via email to