--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> [Barry, 2:20 a.m. EST:]
> > I have no interest in this, except to correct
> > a mistake below:
> 
> [Barry, 3:22 a.m. EST:]
> > All in all, it's been an interesting discussion,
> > if a little long-winded.
> 
> <guffaw>

What's-her-name obviously cannot read. The 
post I was replying to earlier had gotten
off onto a tangent bashing Vaj's supposed
Buddhism. I of course have no interest in
participating in that. The overall Harris-
Sullivan discussion was interesting in spite
of its long-windedness. Nothing that what's-
her-name "contributed" to the discussion was 
of interest in any way. 

Clear now?  :-)



Reply via email to