--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > [Barry, 2:20 a.m. EST:]
> > > I have no interest in this, except to correct
> > > a mistake below:
> > 
> > [Barry, 3:22 a.m. EST:]
> > > All in all, it's been an interesting discussion,
> > > if a little long-winded.
> > 
> > <guffaw>
> 
> What's-her-name obviously cannot read. The 
> post I was replying to earlier had gotten
> off onto a tangent bashing Vaj's supposed
> Buddhism. I of course have no interest in
> participating in that.

Actually, it was a tangent bashing both Vaj's
and Harris's supposed Buddhism, and Barry obviously
had an interest in what was being said of Harris.

 The overall Harris-
> Sullivan discussion was interesting in spite
> of its long-windedness. Nothing that what's-
> her-name "contributed" to the discussion was 
> of interest in any way. 

Uh-huh.  Says Barry, having just devoted most of
a long post to bashing my contributions (albeit
getting almost all my positions that he was
bashing wrong).




> 
> Clear now?  :-)
>


Reply via email to