--- In [email protected], taskcentered <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> I'm trying to understand your purpose. It seemed you were
> warning readers about something that had not taken place.

Yes, John, warnings are typically about something
that has not yet taken place.  An after-the-fact
warning wouldn't do much good, now, would it?

<snip>
> I'm just not sure I understand why you are flogging
> a hypothetical horse.

*I'm* flogging it??

I mentioned it once.  You're the one who's been
flogging it, repeatedly attempting to suggest that
I must have some nefarious purpose in mind.


Reply via email to