--- In [email protected], taskcentered <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > I'm trying to understand your purpose. It seemed you were > warning readers about something that had not taken place.
Yes, John, warnings are typically about something that has not yet taken place. An after-the-fact warning wouldn't do much good, now, would it? <snip> > I'm just not sure I understand why you are flogging > a hypothetical horse. *I'm* flogging it?? I mentioned it once. You're the one who's been flogging it, repeatedly attempting to suggest that I must have some nefarious purpose in mind.
