--- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Reading this post by Michael Dean Goodman: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/131314 > > ... it seems the assumed starting point is always mind's > "thinking" level. > > Given the inward direction of TM-practice it would seem that > clinging to an over-intellectual schematic approach might > become a problem as thoughts becomes feelings, feelings > settles down into sense of my-ness, then am-ness, and is-ness. > > What detailed commentaries has Maharishi offered on the process > below the "thinking" level of the mind. > > Vaj, TB and Paul Mason need not respond.
Thanks for "exempting" me, Peter, but I want to respond to your question anyway. I have no earthly idea what Maharishi might have said about these things, and I don't care. For some of us, meditation is something we do because it enables us to stop thinking and just sit quietly in samadhi. Others seem to use it as something to think even more about. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
