--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On Mar 8, 2007, at 12:43 PM, sparaig wrote:
> > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mar 8, 2007, at 11:18 AM, sparaig wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Are you under the impression that PC is an active mental 
state,
> > >>> filled with thoughts and
> > >>> problem-solving activities?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> There is no mention of PC in the citation Sparaig. I believe 
the
> > >> researchers refer to PC as a "metaphysical
> > >> assertion" rather than any sceintific reality. In fact the 
idea 
> that
> > >> people are experiencing something called PC, is one 
> indoctrinated in
> > >> them before they begin the practice. Unfortunately, it does 
not
> > >> appear the researchers are aware of the tendency 
for "experience
> > >> coaching".
> > >>
> > >
> > > Er, yeah, but the citation of Travis 2004 clearly discusses PC 
> and CC.
> > 
> > 
> > Exactly the point, these are all metaphysical assertions, not  
> > scientific realities, further more TMers--particularly long-
term  
> > TMers are coached as to what these experiences are supposed to 
be 
> and  
> > what they are supposed to mean.
> > 
> > I can't say for sure, but it looks to me as if TM research has  
> > largely been discredited here. All the claims we've heard for 
> years  
> > and years were not only huge exaggerations, but really, really  
> > reaching beyond what was scientifically feasible. A bunch of 
more  
> > research on the same old thing isn't likely to change anything  
> > (except perhaps make it look even more suspect). What I am 
forced 
> to  
> > wonder is 'was there some high-up figurehead in the TMO 
> *insisting*  
> > this is what the data meant', even though it did not. That's 
what 
> it  
> > sounds like is happening.
> >
> Even if all the research is BS, you just can't argue with Reality, 
> can ya?
>
LOL! Thought of something about Vaj's rant this morning- he is 
saying everyone's experience with TM is predicated on auto 
suggestion, and on the other hand redicules me for having had 
experiences they *never* discuss in the TMO. What's up with that? He 
can't win with him Self...

Reply via email to