I am NOT trying to convince you that I am "right" -- I'm probably NOT, since I have been "right" about so few things in my life (and I'm not even convinced that "I" exists). I am NOT trying to convince you that your way of seeing things -- about pundits or about how to choose one's actions -- is "wrong." For all I know, your way of seeing these things may be FAR more "correct" than mine, if such a thing as "correct" exists. I'm just expressing my OPINION, dude. You may do the same.
------Your not right. What you stated was not your opinion, it was your attempt to intimidate through supposed superior knowledge, but that knowledge was merely copied from someone else. Moreover, "adjust ones actions" is not the method of vipassana. Nor of shamatha. Rather, Shamatha is calm abiding, what TM er's call Samadhi, and vippassana is the method of gaining Buddha's insight into ones aggregated nature to discern the meaning of the words of the Buddha from the Nikaya standpoint. Neither is used for 'adjusting' ones behavior, but rather is used for discerning ones behavior. If that leads to 'adjustments' then that's great, if not, then that's great. Don't attempt to try to understand a Tantric Buddhist. At any rate, not with your superficial Buddhist patronymics.
