--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "llundrub" <llundrub@> wrote:
> > >
> > > woolgathering
> > 
> > Main Entry:
> >     wool·gath·er·ing 
> > Pronunciation:
> >     \-&#716;ga-th(&#601;-)ri&#331;, -&#716;ge-th(&#601;-)ri&#331;\ 
> > Function:
> >     noun 
> > Date:
> >     1553
> > 
> > : indulgence in idle daydreaming
> > 
> > Possibly. But how do you feel now, after posting 
> > that one word, as opposed to how you felt before 
> > you pressed Send? 
> > 
> > I'm asking because you claim to be from a Buddhist
> > tradition, and what I wrote about is a traditional
> > Buddhist teaching, one that is still taught by
> > some teachers. I think it's a valuable teaching.
> > But you are free to think whatever you want, and
> > to react to it however you want. IMO what happens
> > to your own state of attention when you *do* react 
> > either verifies or disproves the teaching. Watch
> > the rest of your day, and compare it to yesterday
> > or the day before, and get back to me, eh?
> 
> How did you feel after you pressed send when you 
> posted the "What TMers Believe" volumes I and II?

Pretty good. None of the quotes in them, after all,
were mine. 

I would think the more relevant question to the
technique I've been talking about is what did YOU
think of seeing your words alongside the others in
that post, and presented as if you and your words
represented TM and Maharishi?

What are YOU going to feel if/when I post THINGS
TMers BELIEVE, Volume III, and if/when you find
one or more of your quotes in it? 



Reply via email to