Apparently the basic problem is not quantity but lack of quality. So, aside limiting Vaj's barrage of closet-illuminati propaganda snipets to 3 or 5 a day, how about introducting an upper limit on the number of words a reply may contain (perhaps not for original postings), including what is quoted?
By doing it this way, responders will be forced to be more selective, concise and to the point, without giving up their perceived right to respond - in short a remedy may have been found for TurkeyB's intestinal condition. --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > A more important point would be to restrict posters who can't refrain from > bad-mouthing each other. This is a harder one to police because it's a > subjective judgment. I have to work and can't sit here all day deliberating > on the tone of people's posts. Any suggestions? > [snip]
