--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], gullible fool <fflmod@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Richard and Judy, Rick said he wanted to try out
> > limiting the quantity of posts first and maybe move on
> > to doing something about the quality of posts later.
> > The hope is that it won't be necessary to moderate for
> > quality because members will use their five posts
> > carefully.
> 
> Oh, hm, I guess I must have misinterpreted this
> from Rick (message #135736 from last night):
> 
> Me:
> Try requiring Barry to stop and see what happens.
> 
> Rick:
> It's probably a time zone thing, but at this point, he has 
> stopped and you haven't. Tomorrow the ax falls. 
> 
> And this (message #135730):
> 
> So starting tomorrow if either of them [i.e., Barry or Judy] 
> mentions the other in an offensive or defensive tone, they'll 
> be switched to moderated status. In other words, their posts 
> will require moderator approval before showing up on the list.
> 
> Oh, wait, I see.  It's *just* Barry and me who
> are subject to moderation.  It's still perfectly
> OK for Vaj to attack Lawson.
> 
> Thanks for clarifying.


Since I don't really have much to say today, I 
thought I'd be generous and use the second of
my five allotted posts to remind Judy that 
she's used up four of her five already. 



Reply via email to