--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "uns_tressor" <uns_tressor@> > wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" > > <willytex@> wrote: > > > uns_tressor wrote: > > > > The danger of the Apaches galloping > > > > over the horizon is relatively low > > > > nowadays, I am told. > > > > The threat which underlay the original tolerance > > of guns is gone. And guns should go along with it. > > Lesislation along with ferocious policing would > > sort it if, and only if, there was the will. > > Uns, just to clarify for a Brit, the purpose > of the original "right to bear arms" language > in the U.S. Constitution was *not* to allow > the people to fight off "Indians" if the need > arose. It was to fight off THEIR OWN > GOVERNMENT if the need arose --
Gordon Bennet. How obtuse. But I should have expected something odd from a country which fits anti-gravity technology to their B2 in order to push it forward rather than lift it up. Uns.
