--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > wrote: > > > > On May 4, 2007, at 8:27 AM, new.morning wrote: > > > > >> What I find interesting is that you have these two people -- > > >> Curtis and Judy -- each of whom have been doing TM regularly > > >> for the past 35 years and yet one has a totally negative > > >> personality and the other has a totally positive personality. > > >> Isn't it fascinating how TM can be done by people of all sorts > > >> of political bents, world views, and attitudes and yet the > > >> light of consciousness shines through in one and hardly > > >> manifests in the other. Yet both meditate! > > >> > > >> I guess consciousness works in strange and wonderful ways > > >> and...uh, what's that you say? WHAT? You're saying Curtis > > >> does NOT practise TM? What? You say he hasn't done TM > > >> regularly in more than 15 years? Really? > > >> > > >> Gosh. > > >> > > >> Well, in the immortal words of Emily Litella: never mind. > > > > > > > > > Its even more facsinating that an observer who has been > > > meditating a similar amount of time could see all things > > > in such black and white absolutist terms. A view that > > > Judy is all negative and Curtis is all positive is quite > > > a belly-laugh. > > What's even funnier is that Shemp apparently > believes he can see "the light of consciousness > shining through." > > > Actually he didn't say which he thought was the positive and > > which the negative one (I'm assuming this was deliberate). > > Your view of which had to be which is pretty telling. > > Actually it would have been difficult for Shemp to > have made it any clearer without actually saying > which he thought was which, so it isn't "telling" > at all. >
Even a chimpanzee from Mars on his first vist to earth could pretty quickly figure out how Shemp feels about Judy. That Shemp's views -- both inherent and explicit in hundreds of past posts -- could be a mystery to some is, well, "telling".
