>> So to say that spiritual pursuits or the workings of Saints >> should be constrained because any attempts by the holy to amass >> money is "bad" is a strange perspective to say the least. > > And curiously widespread. If God is unmanifest and manifest, > money surely will be a part of HE/SHE/IT.
i quite agree, even in Hindu mythology, wealth is merely the blessings of Goddess Lakshmi. However, the Western spiritual history developed a very different traditional outlook, saying that wealth is a hindrance and poverty is a path to more perfect spirituality. this is how the West has viewed it: The "Counsels of Perfection" are chastity, poverty and obedience (cf. canons 599-601). Religious vows of keeping the councils were first taken by St. Francis of Assisi and his followers. They were the first of the mendicant orders. These vows are taken now by all Catholic religious communities founded since the twelveth century. These counsels have been analyzed as a way to keep the world from distracting the soul, on the grounds that the principal good things of this world easily divide themselves into three classes. There are the riches which make life easy and pleasant, there are the pleasures of the flesh which appeal to the appetites, and, lastly, there are honours and positions of authority which delight the self-love of the individual. These three matters, in themselves often innocent and not forbidden to the devout Christian, may yet, even when no kind of sin is involved, hold back the soul from its true aim and vocation, and delay it from becoming entirely conformed to the will of God. It is, therefore, the object of the three counsels of perfection to free the soul from these hindrances. The love of riches is opposed by the counsel of poverty; the pleasures of the flesh, even the lawful pleasures of holy matrimony, are excluded by the counsel of chastity; while the desire for worldly power and honour is met by the counsel of holy obedience. Abstinence from unlawful indulgence in any of these directions is forbidden to all Christians as a matter of precept. The further voluntary abstinence from what is in itself lawful is the subject of the counsels, and such abstinence is not in itself meritorious, but only becomes so when it is done for the sake of Christ, and in order to be more free to serve Him. taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelical_counsels
