--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Judy: "Uh-huh. Thing is, it's not as obvious as > you'd like to think. > > Maybe you should just work on being more > straightforward:" > > Me: I was wondering how you would spin your ridiculous > misunderstanding as my fault. > > Nice touch not backing down on the victim point. > > <horselaugh>
River in Egypt... > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > They woke me up in the middle of the night and forced me to > > > > > buy a deerskin against my will. > > > > > > > > <horselaugh> > > > > > > > > I'm sorry, Curtis, but how do you expect to be > > > > taken seriously with an assertion like that? > > > > > > > > > I don't expect jokes to be taken seriously Judy. Given how obvious > > > that was I certainly don't expect to be understood in anything more > > > subtle. > > > > Uh-huh. Thing is, it's not as obvious as > > you'd like to think. > > > > Maybe you should just work on being more > > straightforward: > > > > > > <Snip> > > > > > > > Curtis: Since I have repeated numerous times that I was not > > > > > > > victimized by the movement, this statement is knowingly > > false. > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, no, it's not. It may be "false," but not > > > > > > knowingly. It's based on what you've said here > > > > > > and on alt.m.t, and goodness knows I'm not the > > > > > > only person to understand it that way, your denials > > > > > > notwithstanding. > > > > > > > > > > So even though I do not consider myself a victim, because I > > > > > chose my participation freely, you can label me a victim and > > > > > criticize me for being a victim? > > > > > > > > Uh, no. See if you can extract a more appropriate > > > > meaning from what I wrote.
