"claudiouk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:". . . amazing how the mere act of observation can alter outcomes in quantum experiments."
Hmmm, I'm thinking that "observation" as defined in today's physics is actually not such. It's not witnessing that changes the observed, it's the throwing of objects at the observed that skew measurements of it. That's interfering physically -- not merely absorbing quanta radiating off the object. The concept is that when one deals with the finest aspects of physicality, one's tools become like gorilla fingers trying to do needlepoint. Oh, how I'd love for physics to explain action at a distance instead of being merely content to have the math to predict how gravity and electromagnetism work -- somewhat anyway, but they haven't solved the three body problem yet. Newton said, "Hypothesis non fingo," when he considered action at a distance, and today's physicists cop out the same way. No progress. They don't know how the earth can grab the moon. And now, the truth. The earth is expanding at the speed of light. It grows 186,000 miles bigger in all directions every second. The moon expands too, but because it's smaller, it expands into a smaller biggerness than the earth grows to in the same amount of time; thus the earth expands "into" the moon which is pushed outwards by this radiation. The moon in turn is pressuring the entire universe also, and the universe is expanding too and thus puts "back pressure" on the moon. The moon takes the path of least resistance between the earth's expansion and the "compaction" of our solar system by the universe's pressurings. This is called orbiting, but there's no gravity holding the moon. There's no gravity period. There's only the expansion of the earth that keeps us pinned to the surface -- we're on an exploding ball. Now you know. Edg
