new morning wrote: > You are missing my point. > It's not a stretch of the imagination to believe that Mia tried to jumb Marshy's bones in the cave that night. She has a record of attempting to seduce older men with power, Frank before Marshy, and Woody after. Robert Gimbel also pointed this out.
And it's not a stretch of the imagination to believe that John Lennon did drugs at the Rishikesh TTC. Robert also pointed out that Magic Alex was smuggling in drugs of all kinds. Are we to assume that the drugs were for Cynthia or Jane Asher? I think not. And it is not a stretch of the imagination to believe that the Marshy kicked the Beatles out of the Rishikesh TTC. The way John left in such a huff has all the earmarks of a drug-induced, paranoid freakout of someone who is stoned out of his mind on LSD or some other substance. Are we to believe that John or Paul objected to a rumor cast about by Magic Alex that Marshy had a tumble with a nurse? Now that's a stretch! John Lennon most likely couldn't wait to get back to his London digs and his stash and Paul would hardly be a candidate for moral outrage since he was sleeping with Jane in front of the conservative crew headed by Nancy de Herrerra. However, it is a stretch of the imagination to believe that Marshy, who was celibate up until age 50, would succumb to carnal temptations for a year or so, then go back to being celibate for the next forty years. This was pointed out by Lawson English on more than one occasion. It's also a pretty big stretch of the imagination to believe that Marshy would be attracted to any skinny, white bliss-ninny at 3:00 AM in the middle of the night at a yoga camp with a skin-boy crouching outside the door. But if so, so what, according to Curtis. It is also a stretch of the imagination to believe that the Marshy was able to pull this off in front of Mother Olsen, Debbie Jarvis and Ms Pittman. I just don't see how the Marshy could have done this with thousands of people walking in and out of his bedroom on a daily basis. But IT IS NOT a stretch of the imagination to believe that some women, seeking power and TMO status, would want to seduce the Marshy. Curtis and Ned have already admitted that one of the primary reasons they attended these TTCs was to get women into bed. I've posted an excerpt from Ned's book which is a clear example of this. But, MY point is that either way, there are some who owe us all an explanation. These events, and the TTC's in Spain and Switzerland, happpened a long time ago, back in the late '60s and early '70s. If it's true about Marshy having sexual relations with female students way back then, why weren't were warned about this a long time ago? Instead, we have Governors and Ministers, who mixed up and served the kool-aid, still not coming clean to this very day. For example, Tom Anderson, who claims to have been Marshy's personal secretary at Majorrca TTC, worked for Marshy for over three years and in over a hundred derogatory posts to Usenet over a period of years, never once mentioned this, and Tom is obviously not a great admirer of the Marshy! It seems to me, that if someone is going to put Marshy on the same level as Da, Sai Baba, Swami Rama, and Fred Lentz, they should at least explain why they tacked up all those posters promising enlightenment in 5-7 years AFTER the alleged events took place. What's up with that? I can understand why they wouldn't want to refund any money for selling water down by the river, (since they are probably all broke now) and I can understand why they'd be defensive about passing out all the kool-aid, but why can't we have a little honesty here? Judy apparently thinks it would be a good idea. Some of those claiming TMO status are even using annonymous names, so what's up with that? Or, is it true that almost everyone here hasn't been inside a Marshy Golden Dome in years or that they spent all of, what, one minute in a one-on-one conversation with the Marshy. I'd be willing to believe that not a single informer on this list ever got within ten yards of the Marshy. Yet they would like everyone to think that they are some kind of expert on the comings-and-goings of Mr. Varma, who hasn't even been seen in public for thirty years. But what is most puzzling to me is why would the kool-aid mixer put up a discussion forum to discuss spiritual subjects and then bring it down with work-a-day gossip in emails by the likes of Ned Wynn? Now THAT is a 'go figure'! And they call me a troll for bringing this up? At any rate, for those who are interested, here is a link to some of my 1,000s of 'stories' posted to Usenet since 1999. Enjoy. WARNING!!! There are some informers here who do not want you to read these posts, you have been warned. Sorted by date: http://tinyurl.com/yq8baa Reflections on the Transcendent: http://www.rwilliams.us/ > I did not say I beleive the above, I am simply applying the > logic found in some posts, or extensions of it. > > I have no (stated) opinion to be changed by reading his past > posts. I have read enough to draw my own (perhaps quite > erroneous and hollow) conclusions about them -- my own "stories". > > And that you cannot gladly and eagerly hold in your mind the > contradictions between your view of truth and Richard's > implies you are like "totally not spiritual" :) (All > contradictions being like really spiritual. Haven't you even > read Jaiami dude!?) :) >
