--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2007, at 1:51 PM, authfriend wrote:
<snip>
> > It looks to me, from reading the material about
> > the book from Gratzon and others, that it's very
> > much along the lines of "The Secret."
> >
> > I'm not endorsing Gratzon's approach, by the way,
> > or suggesting that TMers haven't crafted or gotten
> > suckered by get-rich-quick schemes. But Gratzon's
> > book ain't one of 'em.
> >
> > My only point is that Vaj did not tell the truth
> > when he claimed there were links to get-rich-quick
> > schemes from a Google search for the phrase "Do
> > nothing and accomplish everything," and that he
> > continues to tell falsehoods in an attempt to cover
> > up that unfortunate fact.
> >
> > As usual, though, nobody but me seems to think
> > there's anything wrong with that.
> Don't assume that the world revolves around Google. Most of what
> I'm sharing will be apparent to those who actually have not lived
> sequestered lives but have some experience in the movement and the
> people who were part of it.
("Lived sequestered lives"? Vaj thinks I've led a
sequestered life? That's hilarious.)
Vaj is *still* trying to cover up the lie he told
about having found lots of links to "get-rich-quick
schemes" in a Google search of the phrase "Do
nothing and accomplish everything."
There were no such links. He made it up. The only
links to that phrase were to a book by a TM
teacher that had nothing to do with "get-rich-quick
schemes."
(Actually there may have been a couple of links to
TM-related sites that discussed what MMY means by
the phrase, which obviously has nothing to do with
get-rich-quick schemes either.)
> I see Judy as someone very much on the
> periphery of the movement
Not even on the periphery, as I have made quite
clear.
> (likely not even able to meditate in the
> domes, a course reject)
I've been accepted on every course I've ever
applied to, actually, several dozen over the
years. (Never applied to one at MUM other than
my TM-Sidhis block, though.)
who only pieces together info from secondary
> sources. I postulate my claims based on direct experience
> of people involved in movement inspired businesses and the
> financial disasters that ensued. The reason no one supports
> your dissembling is they see it as just that: a second or
> third handed attempt to build an argument based on google-loka.
As Vaj knows, he's misrepresenting my argument.
It has to do with direct experience of Vaj and
Google, not with the movement or the financial
problems of TMers.
Vaj told a lie about what he had found on Google.
That's my argument, and as Vaj knows, it's he who
is dissembling, not me.
> Maybe if you had some better social skills people could actually
> believe you've been out there and seen something, anything that
> supports your desperate attempts at salvaging your point.
My point was that Vaj lied about what he had
found on Google, and it has no need of salvaging,
thank you, as anyone can determine for themselves
by doing the same search.
But based
> on your (apparently) sequestered life, I doubt you get out
> that much my dear.
Vaj, you're going to need another shovel soon.
The one you've been using isn't going to hold up
much longer.
